4.4 Article

Nutrition information-seeking behaviour of Indonesian pregnant women

期刊

MIDWIFERY
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103040

关键词

Nutrition information; nutrition education; pregnancy; adult learning; food literacy

类别

资金

  1. School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study highlighted that most Indonesian pregnant women passively receive nutrition information rather than actively seek it; they obtain nutrition information from various sources including health professionals, social networks, and the internet; health professionals fail to provide consistent and timely information, resulting in gaps between the information provided and the expectations of pregnant women.
Objective: To investigate Indonesian pregnant women's experiences in seeking and receiving nutrition information. Design: Qualitative semi-structured interviews analysed with thematic analysis. Setting and participants: Twenty-three pregnant women in Malang City, Indonesia were interviewed between December 2018 and January 2019. Findings: Four key themes emerged concerning pregnant women's nutrition information-seeking behaviour: (i) Most women passively received nutrition information rather than actively seeking it; (ii) Women sought and received nutrition information from multiple sources including health professionals, social networks and the Internet, with varying levels of trust; (iii) Health professionals, including doctors, midwives and nutritionists, did not provide consistent and timely information; and (iv) Most women could identify gaps between nutrition information provided by health professionals and their expectations. Key conclusions and implications for practice: This study identified opportunities for Indonesian health authorities to enhance their nutrition education services. This study suggests improvements that could extend the systematic provision of nutrition education to meet the needs of pregnant women in developing countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据