4.6 Review

Microbial Community Resilience across Ecosystems and Multiple Disturbances

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00026-20

关键词

aquatic; compounded; disturbance; microbial communities; resilience; soil; terrestrial

资金

  1. UBFC-ISITE senior fellowship [RA19016.AEC.IS]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability of ecosystems to withstand disturbances and recover their functions is increasingly tested under global environmental change. Microorganisms play a crucial role in ecosystem functioning, and understanding how they respond to multiple disturbances is essential for predicting ecosystem resilience.
The ability of ecosystems to withstand disturbances and maintain their functions is being increasingly tested as rates of change intensify due to climate change and other human activities. Microorganisms are crucial players underpinning ecosystem functions, and the recovery of microbial communities from disturbances is therefore a key part of the complex processes determining the fate of ecosystem functioning. However, despite global environmental change consisting of numerous pressures, it is unclear and controversial how multiple disturbances affect microbial community stability and what consequences this has for ecosystem functions. This is particularly the case for those multiple or compounded disturbances that occur more frequently than the normal recovery time. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the mechanisms that can govern the responses of microbes to multiple disturbances across aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. We first summarize and discuss properties and mechanisms that influence resilience in aquatic and soil biomes to determine whether there are generally applicable principles. Following, we focus on interactions resulting from inherent characteristics of compounded disturbances, such as the nature of the disturbance, timing, and chronology that can lead to complex and nonadditive effects that are modulating the response of microorganisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据