4.5 Review

Relationship between long non-coding RNA polymorphism and the risk of coronary artery disease A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

MEDICINE
卷 100, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025146

关键词

coronary artery disease; long non-coding RNA; meta-analysis; polymorphism; protocol

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81700733]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the association between LncRNA polymorphism and the risk of coronary artery disease, and the results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.
Background: Previous epidemiological studies displayed that long non-coding RNA (LncRNA) polymorphisms are associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease, while the results are inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to more accurately determine the association between LncRNA polymorphism and the risk of coronary artery disease. Methods: PubMed, EmBase and Web of Science databases were searched, and the time to build the database was set until December 2020. The association between LncRNA polymorphism and the risk of coronary artery disease was collected and evaluated. Meta-analysis was performed by STATA 14.0 software, and the odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were applied to estimate the association between LncRNA polymorphism and the risk of coronary artery disease. Results: The results of this meta-analysis will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. Conclusion: This meta-analysis will summarize the relationship between LncRNA polymorphism and coronary disease risk. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was not required for this study. The systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, presented at conferences, and shared on social media platforms. This review would be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal or conference presentations. OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/9XPHS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据