4.7 Article

Identification of noncovalent proteasome inhibitors with high selectivity for chymotrypsin-like activity by a multistep structure based virtual screening

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 578-591

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.05.049

关键词

Proteasome inhibitors; Non-covalent; Peptide scaffold; Docking studies; Virtual screening

资金

  1. Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica [MIUR-PRIN], Rome, Italy [2010W7YRLZ_003, 2010W7YRLZ_004]
  2. Research & Mobility Program of the University of Messina

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Noncovalent proteasome inhibitors introduce an alternative mechanism of inhibition to that of covalent inhibitors, e.g. carfilzomib, used in cancer therapy. A multistep hierarchical structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) of the 65,375 NCI lead-like compound library led to the identification of two compounds (9 and 28) which noncovalently inhibited the chymotrypsin-like (ChT-L) activity (K-i = 2.18 and 2.12 mu M, respectively) with little or no effects on the other two major proteasome proteolytic activities, trypsin-like (T-L) and post-glutamyl peptide hydrolase (PGPH) activities. A subsequent hierarchical similarity search over the full NCI database with the most active tripeptide-based inhibitor 9 resulted in the discovery of the beta 5/beta 6-specific tripeptide derivative 38 that noncovalently binds the ChT-L site (K-i = 0.42 mu M). The solution structure of 9 and 38 was solved by H-1 NMR spectroscopy and the binding mode of the inhibitors was elucidated by docking experiments using the yeast 20S proteasome. Compound 38 (IC50 = 26.7 mu M) is slightly more potent than 9 (IC50 = 34.3 mu M) at inhibiting survival of dexamethasone-resistant (MM.1R) human multiple myeloma cells. The identified ligand thus provides valuable insights for the future structure-based design of subtype-specific proteasome inhibitors. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据