4.6 Article

Report of Task Group 201 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine: Quality management of external beam therapy data transfer

期刊

MEDICAL PHYSICS
卷 48, 期 6, 页码 E86-E114

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mp.14868

关键词

29.1 (TH-Dataset analysis/biomathematics Informatics); 31.1 (TH-External beamphotons General (most aspects)); data transfer; information systems; quality assurance; quality control; quality management program; Taxonomy: 25.1; 3(IM/TH-Formal quality management tools; General (most aspects); Root Cause Analysis)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This report summarizes findings and recommendations from a task group on quality assurance of external beam treatment data transfer, aiming to assist medical physicists in designing their own data transfer quality management program. Recommended tests are suggested based on collective experience, aiming to ensure the quality of data transfers and move towards open standards compatibility.
With the advancement of data-intensive technologies, such as image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the amount and complexity of data to be transferred between clinical subsystems have increased beyond the reach of manual checking. As a result, unintended treatment deviations (e.g., dose errors) may occur if the treatment system is not closely monitored by a comprehensive data transfer quality management program (QM). This report summarizes the findings and recommendations from the task group (TG) on quality assurance (QA) of external beam treatment data transfer (TG-201), with the aim to assist medical physicists in designing their own data transfer QM. As a background, a section of this report describes various models of data flow (distributed data repositories and single data base systems) and general data test characteristics (data integrity, interpretation, and consistency). Recommended tests are suggested based on the collective experience of TG-201 members. These tests are for the acceptance of, commissioning of, and upgrades to subsystems that store and/or modify clinical treatment data. As treatment complexity continues to evolve, we will need to do and know more about ensuring the quality of data transfers. The report concludes with the recommendation to move toward data transfer open standards compatibility and to develop tools that automate data transfer QA. (C) 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据