4.7 Article

Analysis of the dynamics of a slider-crank mechanism locally actuated with an act-and-wait controller

期刊

MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY
卷 159, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104253

关键词

Slider-crank mechanism; Lagrange equations; Resonance; Act-and-wait; Non-isochronous

资金

  1. Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship Agency (VLAIO) [HBC.2018.2055]
  2. Flanders Make

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new design of a slider-crank mechanism, which achieves continuous movement and minimizes the loads transmitted through the mechanical structure through local linear actuation. The study indicates that operating at the resonance frequency of the system yields optimal results.
Traditional use of slider-crank mechanisms result in high loads transmitted through the mechanical structure, inhibiting the design of a compact machine. Therefore, this paper proposes to step away from the conventional, i.e. rotative, actuation and to investigate local linear actuation of the slider-component directly, while maintaining the kinematic link. In this work the equation of motion and corresponding non-isochronous movement are derived for the proposed system, loaded with a linear spring-damper element. Afterwards the focus shifts towards the evaluation of the local linear actuating principle by implementing an act-and-wait control strategy in a multibody model in Simscape. The obtained configuration results both in a continuous movement of the slider mechanism where Top Dead Centre & Bottom Dead Centre are reached and in a minimisation of the loads transmitted through the mechanical structure. Further investigation of one of the most determining parameters, i.e. the operating frequency, proves that operating at the resonance frequency of the system, yields optimal results. This configuration allows for the reduction of the loads transmitted through the system by 90% of the nominal spring-damper load. ? 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据