4.5 Article

Phase-aberration compensation via deep learning in digital holographic microscopy

期刊

MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 32, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/ac0216

关键词

digital holographic; phase aberration compensation; convolutional neural network; morphological characteristics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12072070, 51505076]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [2015020105]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N140304010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A numerical method based on deep learning combined with DHM is proposed for phase-aberration compensation, achieving high precision in reconstructing topographical images. Experimental results confirm that the trained CNN can accurately segment the sample from the background area of the hologram, demonstrating the applicability and effectiveness of this method in off-axis DHM.
Digital holographic microscopy (DHM), a quantitative phase-imaging technology, has been widely used in various applications. Phase-aberration compensation in off-axis DHM is vital to reconstruct topographical images with high precision, especially for microstructures with a small background or a dense phase distribution. We propose a numerical method based on deep learning combined with DHM. First, a convolutional neural network (CNN) recognizes and segments the sample and the background area of the hologram. Zernike polynomial fitting is then executed on the extracted background area. Finally, the whole process of phase-aberration compensation is automatically performed. To obtain a robust and accurate deep-learning model for hologram segmentation, we collected many holograms corresponding to several samples that had different morphological characteristics. The experimental results confirm that the trained CNN can accurately segment the sample from the background area of the hologram, and that this method is applicable and effective in off-axis DHM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据