4.7 Article

Study on the effect of cutting parameters on bamboo surface quality using response surface methodology

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109002

关键词

Response surface method; Variance analysis; Mathematical model; Minimum surface roughness

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Forestry and Nanjing Forestry University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study optimized diamond cutting tools for bamboo cutting using response surface methodology and found that feed speed has a significant impact on surface roughness. The best cutting combination can achieve better surface quality.
The surface roughness of bamboo milling is one of the important indexes to evaluate the surface quality of bamboo milling. This article outlines the application of response surface methodology to optimize diamond cutting tools for bamboo cutting. In the experiment, different cutting speed, feed rate and depth of cut were used as cutting parameters, and the surface roughness was used to evaluate the surface quality of bamboo cutting. The results of the experiment were evaluated by variance analysis, graphical method and numerical method. The response surface method and expected value function are used to determine the mathematical model of bamboo surface roughness and the cutting parameter combination corresponding to the best cutting process. The result shows that the influence of feed speed on the surface roughness of the bamboo chord surface (Ra1) and the bamboo end surface roughness (Ra2) is more obvious, and the cutting parameters have little effect on the bamboo diameter surface roughness (Ra3). The cutting technology with the best surface quality is determined by optimization analysis. The established mathematical model can effectively predict the response within the range of cutting parameters, and the optimized combination of cutting parameters can obtain better surface quality of bamboo milling. The best bamboo surface roughness after optimization can be obtained at higher cutting speed, low feed speed and lower cutting depth is Ra1 = 1.5832 ?m, Ra2 = 6.3626 ?m, Ra3 = 2.2438 ?m.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据