4.8 Article

Local chemical fluctuation mediated ductility in body-centered-cubic high-entropy alloys

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY
卷 46, 期 -, 页码 28-34

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mattod.2021.02.022

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11725210, 11672355, 11790293, 51871016, 51671021, 51971017, 52071023, 52061135207]
  2. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [JCYJ20170413141157573]
  3. Research Grant Council of Hong Kong [C1027-14E]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study captured the dynamic interaction between LCFs and dislocations in ductile BCC HfNbTiZr HEAs, demonstrating how LCFs influence strength and ductility by promoting dislocation interaction. The observed double cross-slips caused by LCFs homogenously distribute dislocations onto various atomic planes, contributing to ductilization in HfNbTiZr. These findings offer insights into the deformation mechanisms of HEAs and suggest new strategies for designing ductile BCC HEAs.
High-entropy alloys (HEAs) open up a new horizon for discovering un-explored mechanical properties and deformation mechanisms. Local chemical fluctuations (LCFs) in HEAs were found to have significant influences on their mechanical performance, however, the underlying origins remain unclear. In this work, direct dynamic observation of the interaction between LCFs and dislocations was captured by in situ transmission electron microscopy in a ductile body-centered-cubic (BCC) HfNbTiZr HEA under loading. The observed dislocation pinning induced by LCFs contributes to the increment not only in the strength but also in the ductility due to strongly promoted dislocation interaction. The observed local double cross-slips caused by the LCFs distribute dislocations onto various atomic planes homogenously, which is also beneficial for ductilization in HfNbTiZr. Our findings not only shed light on the understanding of deformation mechanisms of HEAs, but also provide a new perspective to design ductile BCC HEAs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据