4.7 Article

Correlation mechanism of grain orientation/microstructure and mechanical properties of Cu?Ni?Si?Co alloy

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.141239

关键词

Cu?Ni?Si?Co alloy; Texture; Physical properties; Schmid factor; Twin stacking-fault probability

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0301302]
  2. 2011 Program of Ministry of Education of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the relationship between microstructure and properties of a Copper-Nickel-Silicon-Cobalt alloy with different orientations. Results showed that the aged alloy exhibited clear anisotropy, showing different mechanical properties and conductivity between grains in the hard oriented zone and soft oriented zone.
The relationship between the microstructure and properties of the different orientations of a Cu?Ni?Si?Co alloy was investigated by tensile testing, X-ray diffraction electron backscattering diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, and high-energy X-ray diffraction (HEXRD). The results revealed that the cold-rolled alloy contained mainly a Brass {110} 112 211 texture. The alloy was aged, and it exhibited mainly an R texture, and its volume and distributing width were 45.2% and 10.8?, respectively. The aged alloy exhibited obvious anisotropy, and its tensile strength and electrical conductivity in the rolling direction were 870 MPa and 50% IACS, respectively. In the Cu?Ni?Si?Co alloy, the orientation grains close to the [111] crystal plane were in the hard orientation zone, the Schmid factor value was low, and the material strength was relatively high. At the same time, the [111] crystal plane was close-packed and exhibited good conductivity. The oriented grains close to the [100] crystal plane was in the soft oriented zone and had lower strength and conductivity. Through HEXRD analysis, it was found that the oriented grains with a high twin stacking-fault probability had lower stacking fault energy, and the probability of aging-induced twinning was high.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据