4.6 Article

Simple synthesis of ultrafine amorphous silicon carbide nanoparticles by atmospheric plasmas

期刊

MATERIALS LETTERS
卷 299, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2021.130072

关键词

Silicon carbide; Amorphous materials; Nanoparticles; Non-thermal plasma; Photoluminescence

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12075242, 11675177, 11705202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An atmospheric non-thermal arc plasma source based on magnetically stabilized gliding arc discharge was developed for the continuous preparation of ultrafine amorphous silicon carbide (a-SiC) nanoparticles via hexamethyldisilane decomposition. The synthesized nanoparticles showed strong blue-green light emission and had abundant functional groups and oxidized overlayers on their surface. Low input energy favored the synthesis of a-SiC nanoparticles, while high input energy promoted the transition from amorphous structure to b-SiC.
An atmospheric non-thermal arc plasma source based on magnetically stabilized gliding arc discharge was developed for the continuous preparation of ultrafine amorphous silicon carbide (a-SiC) nanoparticles via hexamethyldisilane decomposition. Results showed that the as-synthesized products were a mix of a-SiC nanoparticles and free carbon excess. The average particle size of nanoparticles was about 9 nm, and there were abundant functional groups and oxidized overlayers on the surface of the nanoparticles. Photoluminescence properties revealed the a-SiC nanoparticles had strong blue-green light emission under the excitation of 340-420 nm, which was possibly related to the surface functional groups, oxidized overlayers and quantum confinement effect due to ultrafine size. Correlations between the arc current and the crystal structure of the product indicated that the low input energy favored the synthesis of a-SiC nanoparticles, while the high input energy promoted the transition from amorphous structure to b-SiC. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据