4.6 Article

Electrical conductivity and Hall effect measurements of crystalline copper indium gallium diselenide

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 263, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124436

关键词

Characterization of crystals; CuInGaSe2 (GIGS); Hall effect; Characterization of semiconducting quaternary compounds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The principal properties of CuInGaSe2 (CIGS) crystals were investigated using temperature-dependent electrical and Hall effect techniques. The crystals were effectively developed using the modified Bridgman strategy. Various physical parameters were estimated for the majority and minority carriers, and it was found that carrier concentration and Hall mobility significantly depended on temperature.
The principal properties of the CuInGaSe2 (CIGS) crystals were investigated in this work by using temperature-dependent electrical and Hall effect. CIGS crystals were developed effectively with the modified Bridgman strategy. The electrical conductivity and Hall effect measurements have been explored in the investigated temperature range was between 198 K and 388 K. Various physical parameters such as mobility carrier, resistivity, carrier concentration, and the coefficient of the Hall effect and conductivity were estimated for the majority and for minority carriers. The estimates of DC electrical conductivity were made using traditional two-probe technique for CIGS crystals. Consequently, the activation energies were determined by investigating temperature dependence of DC conductivity. The results of Hall effect measurements of CIGS crystals show that all samples were (p-type), the carrier concentration, and Hall mobility are unequivocally reliant on the temperature. For the first time, complete pictures for the main physical parameters like as hole's diffusion coefficient, the mean free time, and the diffusion length of the holes for our crystal were determined by investigating DC electrical conductivity and Hall effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据