4.5 Article

Density and shrinkage evaluation of AISI 316L parts printed via FDM process

期刊

MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
卷 36, 期 13, 页码 1535-1543

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2021.1905830

关键词

FDM; processability; shrinkage; density; ultrafuse; aisi 316l; metal; filament; stainless steel; additive

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal FDM process provides a cost-effective alternative to traditional metal Additive Manufacturing technologies. Experimental analysis shows that different process parameters can significantly affect the density and porosity of metal samples, with certain parameter combinations leading to higher nominal densities and lower levels of opened porosity.
Metal FDM process is a valid alternative to costly, energy consuming and less accessible metal Additive Manufacturing technologies. Metal parts were fabricated by means of a low-cost FDM machine with a filament composed of 316 L stainless steel particles and polymeric binder mixture, followed by debinding and sintering treatments. The objective of the study is to investigate the possible influence of some relevant FDM printing parameters on dimensional shrinkage and bulk density of the metal samples. The experimental analysis was conducted by means of a statistical method (ANOVA). Besides, a porosity evaluation was carried out to identify the real density values and the amount of opened and closed porosities of samples characterized with highest and lowest bulk density. Lines infill pattern, extrusion speed set to 20 mm/s and 0.1 mm as layer thickness was the combination of process parameters that ensured the highest nominal density (i.e. 95% of the monolithic 316 L nominal density). The statistical analysis did not show any effects due to the nozzle temperature on the bulk density. X and Y shrinkages settled around 16%, while shrinkages along Z-axis showed a greater variability. The samples with the worst bulk density showed a higher percentage of opened porosity, while the percentage of opened porosity for samples with the best combination of process parameters resulted less than 3%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据