4.7 Article

Distribution of mercury species in different tissues and trophic levels of commonly consumed fish species from the south Bay of Biscay (France)

期刊

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
卷 166, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112172

关键词

Methylmercury; Contamination; Organotropism; Bioaccumulation; Teleostei

资金

  1. ERDF (European Regional Development Fund)
  2. AEAG (Agence de l'Eau Adour-Garonne) under the MICROPOLIT project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Different fish species showed variations in Hg concentrations, with higher levels consistently found in muscle and liver. These results may be related to physiological processes.
Mercury (Hg) is a contaminant of global concern in marine ecosystems, notably due to its ability to accumulate and concentrate in food webs. Concentrations of total mercury (THg), methylmercury (MeHg) and inorganic mercury (IHg) were assessed and compared in different tissues (liver, muscle, and gonads) of three common fish species (hake Merluccius merluccius, red mullet Mullus surmuletus, and sole Solea solea) from the continental shelf from the southern part of the Bay of Biscay. Several studies investigated Hg concentration in fish muscle, but few assessed concentrations in other organs, despite the importance of such data to understand contaminant organotropism and metabolization. Results showed that trophic position and feeding habitat are required to understand the variability of Hg concentration in muscle between fish species. In addition, high MeHg/THg ratio in muscle could be explained by the predatory behavior of the studied fish species and the biomagnification of this Hg species within the food web, MeHg. Despite differences between species, Hg concentration was always higher in muscle (from 118 ? 64 to 338 ? 101 ng g-1 w.w.) and liver (from 122 ? 108 to 271 ? 95 ng g-1 w.w.). These results can be related to physiological processes especially the MeHg detoxification strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据