4.7 Article

Novel chromone and xanthone derivatives: Synthesis and ROS/RNS scavenging activities

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 115, 期 -, 页码 381-392

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.03.043

关键词

Chromones; Xanthones; Reactive oxygen species; Reactive nitrogen species; Antioxidant activity

资金

  1. FCT [SFRH/BD/86277/2012, SFRH/BPD/76909/2011]
  2. FSE
  3. national funds of MCTES
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/86277/2012] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chromones and xanthones are oxygen-containing heterocyclic compounds acknowledged by their antioxidant properties. In an effort to develop novel agents with improved activity, a series of compounds belonging to these chemical classes were prepared. Their syntheses involve the condensation of appropriate 2-methyl-4H-chromen-4-ones, obtained via Baker-Venkataraman rearrangement, with (E)-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)acrylaldehyde to provide the corresponding 2-[(1E,3E)-4-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)buta-1,3-dien-1-y1]-4H-chromen-4-ones. Subsequent electrocyclization and oxidation of these compounds led to the synthesis of 1-aryl-9H-xanthen-9-ones. After cleavage of the protecting groups, hydroxylated chromones and xanthones were assessed as scavenging agents against both reactive oxygen species (ROS) [superoxide radical (On, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hypochlorous acid (HOG), singlet oxygen (O-1(2)), and peroxyl radical (ROW)] and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) [nitric oxide ((NO)-N-center dot) and peroxynitrite anion (ONOO-)]. Generally, all the tested new hydroxylated chromones and xanthones exhibited scavenger effects dependent on the concentration, with IC50 values found in the micromolar range. Some of them were shown to have improved scavenging activity when compared with previously reported analogues, allowing the inference of preliminary conclusions on the structure activity relationship. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据