4.7 Article

Antiplasmodial Compounds from Deep-Water Marine Invertebrates

期刊

MARINE DRUGS
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/md19040179

关键词

bebrycin A; nitenin; antiplasmodial; Bebryce grandis; Spongia lamella; marine natural product; malaria; P; falciparum

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [R21 AI078376]
  2. National Institutes of Health, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health [1RC2AT005917]
  3. Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel diterpene bebrycin A and known terpene nitenin showed potent antiplasmodial effects against chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum strain Dd2, with different mechanisms of action at different stages of the intraerythrocytic life cycle of the parasite.
Novel drug leads for malaria therapy are urgently needed because of the widespread emergence of resistance to all available drugs. Screening of the Harbor Branch enriched fraction library against the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine-resistant strain (Dd2) followed by bioassay-guided fractionation led to the identification of two potent antiplasmodials; a novel diterpene designated as bebrycin A (1) and the known C21 degraded terpene nitenin (2). A SYBR Green I assay was used to establish a Dd2 EC50 of 1.08 +/- 0.21 and 0.29 +/- 0.02 mu M for bebrycin A and nitenin, respectively. Further analysis was then performed to assess the stage specificity of the inhibitors antiplasmodial effects on the Dd2 intraerythrocytic life cycle. Exposure to bebrycin A was found to block parasite maturation at the schizont stage if added any time prior to late schizogony at 42 hours post invasion, (HPI). In contrast, early life cycle exposure to nitenin (prior to 18 HPI) was identified as crucial to parasite inhibition, suggesting nitenin may target the maturation of the parasite during the transition from ring to early trophozoite (6-18 HPI), a novel property among known antimalarials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据