4.7 Article

Stability and in vitro digestion of high purity diacylglycerol oil-in-water emulsions

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111744

关键词

Sesame oil; Oil-in-water emulsion; Physical properties; Freeze-thaw stability; Lipolysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31501443, 32001640]
  2. Ph.D Research Foundation of Shaanxi University of Science Technology [BJ15-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the stability and in vitro digestion of sesame oil-based high purity diacylglycerol (DAG) oil-in-water emulsions. The findings suggest that higher DAG content promotes lipid hydrolysis during simulated digestion, shedding light on the potential use of DAG oil in food emulsions.
In this study, stability and in vitro digestion of sesame oil-based high purity diacylglycerol (DAG) oil-in-water emulsions were investigated. Firstly, the effects of DAG content and the freeze-thaw process on the physical properties of emulsions were assessed. The fresh DAG emulsions exhibited high absolute zeta-potential values (> 40 mV), small d(4,3) (< 0.94 mu m), and good stability during 14 days storage. However, DAG promoted partial coalescence of fat globules and the creaming index increased after the freeze-thaw process. Subsequently, the in vitro digestion of DAG emulsions was studied. The d(4,3) of emulsions increased from 0.942 mu m, 0.754 mu m and 0.489 mu m to 33 mu m (0 g/kg DAG), 30 mu m (50 g/kg DAG) and 25 mu m (100 g/kg DAG) respectively after digestion in the simulated saliva and stomach, and then decreased to 8 mu m, 7 mu m and 5 mu m respectively in the simulated small intestine. Notably, the variation tendency of zeta-potential was opposite to the d4,3 of emulsions during the simulated digestion. Finally, the free fatty acid release was monitored under simulated intestine digestion and it revealed that higher DAG content favored higher lipolysis. This work sheds light on employing DAG oil to prepare food emulsions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据