4.7 Article

Improved photostability of folic acid by the radical-scavenging effect of tannic acid

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111050

关键词

Folic acid; Tannic acid; Radical-scavenging effect; Retention; Gummy

资金

  1. National Key Technologies RD Program [2018YFD0401005]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [31771964, 31571791]
  3. program of China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201806350084]
  4. BASF Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Folic acid degrades into different products under UV irradiation, but the addition of tannic acid (TA) can protect and improve the stability and retention rate of folic acid. Furthermore, TA can enhance the photostability of folic acid by its radical-scavenging effect.
Folic acid (FA) is sensitive to ultraviolet (UV) light and decomposes into photoproducts with higher fluorescence quantum yield: 6-formylpterin (Fop) and p-aminobenzoylglutamic acid (PABA-Glu). Fop is subsequently oxidized into 6-carboxypterin (Cap). The increased fluorescence intensity of FA solution with increasing irradiation time proved the degradation. Addition of tannic acid (TA) at the TA/FA molar ratio of 0.025/1 could protect 99% FA compared to that no FA could be detected without addition of TA after 120 min of UV irradiation. The retention of FA without TA at pH 5-6 was below 0.4% and above 93% at pH 3-4, but the retention of FA with TA was over 97% for pH 3-6. Moreover, the retention of FA with TA in gummy was over 81% which was significantly higher than that of the one without TA. No covalent bonds were formed between TA and FA. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid could not protect FA against photodegradation. Ascorbic acid (Vc) could protect FA to the same extent as TA, but with more addition. It agreed with the results that the DPPH radical-scavenging effect of Vc is lower than TA. These results demonstrated that TA could improve the photostability of FA by the radical-scavenging effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据