4.7 Article

Chemical content and sensory changes of Oloroso Sherry wine when aged with four different wood types

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110706

关键词

Oloroso sherry wine; Wood ageing; Wood toasting; Chemical composition; Sensory analysis

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity (MINECO) [AGL2012-40112]
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the plan I + D + I [AGL2012-40112]
  3. INNTERCONECTA Project INNTER-VINANDAL [ITC20131018]
  4. University of Cadiz

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explored the use of alternative woods for ageing Oloroso Sherry wines, confirming that the chemical composition and sensory characteristics of the aged samples differed from those aged in American oak. The results suggest that using different types of woods and levels of toasting could provide specific differences in products compared to traditional ageing in American oak.
Oloroso Sherry Wine is a fortified Sherry wine obtained by oxidation and ageing in American oak barrels of 500 L-600 L. In this work, the study of the suitability of other types of woods for the ageing of these wines was carried out. To compare the characteristics of the alternative woods, an oloroso wine was aged in four groups of 16 L barrels made of French oak, Spanish oak, chestnut, as well as American oak as control, with intense and medium toasting. Phenolic and furanic compounds, organic acids, volatile compounds, color characteristics, total poly-phenol index and sensory analysis of wines aged for two months were analyzed. The results confirmed that the aged samples could be differentiated on the basis of their chemical composition, and that the use of alternative woods to age oloroso Sherry wines, and the level of wood toasting, had the potential to provide products with specific differences to the traditional aged in American oak. Furthermore, the organoleptic characteristics of these alternative wines were valued above a standard Sherry wine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据