4.7 Review

Targeting RAGE to prevent SARS-CoV-2-mediated multiple organ failure: Hypotheses and perspectives

期刊

LIFE SCIENCES
卷 272, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119251

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; RAGE; HMGB1; Renin-angiotensin system (RAS)

资金

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro [17581]
  2. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Perugia [2019.0321.026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The novel infectious disease COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, can lead to severe pneumonia and ARDS in 15% of patients. Research suggests that RAS and RAGE play crucial roles in mediating susceptibility and pathological responses in COVID-19 patients.
A novel infectious disease (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was detected in December 2019 and declared as a global pandemic by the World Health. Approximately 15% of patients with COVID-19 progress to severe pneumonia and eventually develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), septic shock and/or multiple organ failure with high morbidity and mortality. Evidence points towards a determinant pathogenic role of members of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in mediating the susceptibility, infection, inflammatory response and parenchymal injury in lungs and other organs of COVID-19 patients. The receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE), a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily, has important roles in pulmonary pathological states, including fibrosis, pneumonia and ARDS. RAGE overexpression/hyperactivation is essential to the deleterious effects of RAS in several pathological processes, including hypertension, chronic kidney and cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes, all of which are major comorbidities of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We propose RAGE as an additional molecular target in COVID-19 patients for ameliorating the multi-organ pathology induced by the virus and improving survival, also in the perspective of future infections by other coronaviruses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据