4.8 Article

The Electron-Hole Plasma Contributes to Both Plasmonic and Photonic Lasing from CH3NH3PbBr3 Nanowires at Room Temperature

期刊

LASER & PHOTONICS REVIEWS
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/lpor.202000512

关键词

electron– hole plasma; excitons; perovskite nanowires; photonic lasers; plasmonic lasers

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFE0204000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U20A20206, 51972300, 62011530022, 21975245]
  3. Key Research Program of Frontier Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDBSSW-SLH006]
  4. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB43000000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared plasmonic lasers and photonic counterparts based on CH3NH3PbBr3 perovskite nanowires, and found that they have the same gain origination. The results show that an electron-hole plasma contributes to both types of lasing actions from perovskite nanowires at room temperature.
Lead halide perovskites have gained tremendous attentions in many fields, especially in nanolasers, owing to the excellent optoelectronic properties. However, the underlying lasing mechanism is not clear in both plasmonic and photonic nanolasers at room temperature. Here, the plasmonic lasers and the photonic counterparts based on organic-inorganic hybrid lead tri-bromine perovskite nanowires are achieved at room temperature and are compared in terms of lasing evolution, lasing wavelengths, and lasing dynamics. The same spectra evolution and the same emission wavelength indicate that the plasmonic and the photonic CH3NH3PbBr3 nanowire lasers have the same gain origination. The calculated Mott density lower than the threshold density and lasing photon energy lower than exciton energy prove that an electron-hole plasma contributes to both the two types of lasing actions from perovskite nanowires at room temperature. The work deepens the understanding of underlying mechanism of perovskite nanowire lasers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据