4.6 Article

A Universal Standard Archive File for Adsorption Data

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 37, 期 14, 页码 4222-4226

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c00122

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alexander von Humboldt foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New advanced adsorbents play a crucial role in the development of energy and environmental applications. Machine learning and data mining techniques are powerful tools for identifying suitable adsorbents for specific applications. The proposal of a new standard adsorption information file (AIF) aims to address the inadequacy of current scientific reporting of adsorption isotherms and pave the way for an open adsorption data format.
New advanced adsorbents are a crucial driver for the development of energy and environmental applications. Tremendous potential is provided by machine learning and data mining techniques, as these approaches can identify the most appropriate adsorbent for a particular application. However, the current scientific reporting of adsorption isotherms in graphs and figures is not adequate to reproduce original experimentally measured data. This report proposes the specification of a new standard adsorption information file (AIF) inspired by the ubiquitous crystallographic information file (CIF) and based on the self-defining text archive and retrieval (STAR) procedure, also used to represent biological nuclear magnetic resonance experiments (NMR-STAR). The AIF is a flexible and easily extended free-format archive file that is readily human and machine readable and is simple to edit using a basic text editor or parse for database curation. This format represents the first steps toward an open adsorption data format as a basis for a decentralized adsorption data library. An open format facilitates the electronic transmission of adsorption data between laboratories, journals, and larger databases, which is key in the effort to increase open science in the field of porous materials in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据