4.4 Article

Effects of chloride and other anions on electrochemical chlorine evolution over self-doped TiO2 nanotube array

期刊

KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 756-762

出版社

KOREAN INSTITUTE CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-020-0738-4

关键词

Reduced TiO2 Nanotube Array; Electrochemical Self-doping; Chlorine Evolution; Chloride Concentration; Anion Effect; Hydroxyl Radical

资金

  1. Technology Innovation Program - Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea) [10082572]
  2. Korea Ministry of Environment as Global Top Project [2016002110008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrochemically reduced TiO2 nanotube arrays have shown promising performance in chlorine evolution reaction, particularly at low chloride concentrations, with minimal impact from other anions.
Electrochemically reduced TiO2 nanotube arrays (r-TiO2 NTA) have emerged as an alternative that can replace the dimensionally stable anode (DSA (R)) due to comparable performance for chlorine evolution reaction (ClER). However, previous studies have reported applications of r-TiO2 NTA for ClER only under limited conditions (concentrated NaCl solution without other anions). Thus, the potential of r-TiO2 NTA for CIER has not yet been fully demonstrated. Therefore, this study focused on investigating ClER of r-TiO2 NTA under various parameters such chloride concentration (5-1,000 mM) and the presence of other anions (i.e., SO4(2-), HPO4(2-), and CO3(2-)). The results suggest that, at low chloride concentration (5-50 mM NaCl), the r-TiO2 NTA exhibited higher performance for CIER (production rate of 3.35-9.82 mg l(-1) min(-1), current efficiency of 14.43-42.04%, energy consumption of 69.24-11.02 Wh g(Cl-2)(-1)) than RuO2 (2.55-7.88 mg l(-1) min(-1), 11.07-33.85% and 77.29-6.84 Wh g(Cl-2)(-1), respectively). Additionally, other anions did not affect the ClER of r-TiO2 NTA more than RuO2. These can be explained by the indirect pathway of ClER in r-TiO2 NTA while the direct pathway of RuO2 was negatively affected by dilute chloride and other anions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据