4.7 Article

A stochastic configuration network based on chaotic sparrow search algorithm

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 220, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106924

关键词

Stochastic configuration network; Sparrow search algorithm; Chaotic; Logistic mapping; Optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [61976216, 61672522]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A stochastic configuration network model, CSSA-SCN, based on chaotic sparrow search algorithm is introduced in this paper to enhance the performance of SCN by optimizing network parameters. Experimental results demonstrate the feasibility and validity of CSSA-SCN compared with SCN and other contrast algorithms.
Stochastic configuration network (SCN), as a novel incremental generation model with supervisory mechanism, has an excellent superiority in solving large-scale data regression and classification problems. However, the accuracy of the SCN is affected by the assignation and selection of some network parameters significantly Sparrow search algorithm (SSA) is a new meta-heuristic algorithm that simulates the foraging and anti-predation behavior of sparrow population. In this paper, a stochastic configuration network based on chaotic sparrow search algorithm is first introduced, termed as CSSA-SCN. Firstly, chaotic sparrow search algorithm (CSSA) is designed which mainly utilizes logistic mapping, self-adaptive hyper-parameters, mutation operator to enhance the global optimization capability of SSA; Secondly, as the performance of SCN is related to regularization parameter r and scale factor lambda of weights and biases, then CSSA is employed to give better parameters for SCN automatically; Finally, 13 benchmark functions and several datasets are used to evaluate the performance of CSSA and CSSA-SCN respectively. Experimental results demonstrate the feasibility and validity of CSSA-SCN compared with SCN and other contrast algorithms. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据