4.5 Review

Climatic influence on tree wood anatomy: a review

期刊

JOURNAL OF WOOD SCIENCE
卷 67, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1186/s10086-021-01956-w

关键词

Angiosperm; Environmental change; Gymnosperm; Wood anatomical traits; Xylem

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studying the relationship between wood anatomical traits and environmental changes can provide insights into the adaptation process and response strategies of tree growth to climate, as well as the impact of different climatic factors on the anatomical features of tree rings. By analyzing literature, it is possible to explore how the anatomical characteristics of xylem tree rings are influenced by environmental changes and to understand the specific roles of major climatic factors during different periods of tree-ring formation.
Wood anatomical traits of xylem are the characteristics of tree rings at cellular and subcellular scales providing important insights on structural features and their linkage to the environment. Therefore, studying the relationship between anatomical traits and environmental changes not only provide physiological explanations, but also provide a new vision of studying the adaptation process and response strategies of tree growth to climate. In this paper, I review and synthesize literature on the influence of climatic parameters on wood anatomy from the different geographical regions using recent (2015-2020) published articles on the topic. This paper discusses the relationship between the anatomical features of angiosperm and gymnosperm xylem with climatic factors. Based on the literature, I then purpose to explore the temporal and spatial variations in the anatomical characteristics of xylem tree rings with environmental changes. Also, more studies can be conducted to assess the synergetic and antagonistic effects among different tree-ring proxies and to determine the specific roles and contributions of major climatic factors during different periods of tree-ring formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据