4.2 Article

Automatic Calibration of Bed Friction Coefficients to Reduce the Influence of Seasonal Variation: Case of the Gironde Estuary

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000632

关键词

-

资金

  1. Connecting Europe Facility (CEF)-Transport Sector under agreement (Innovation and Networks Executive Agency) through the project Gironde XL [INEA/CEF/TRAN/M2014/1049680]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An automatic procedure to identify the bed friction coefficient is tested on a 2D hydrodynamic model of the Gironde estuary. Optimization algorithm improves prediction accuracy and different hydrological configurations require adaptation of the bed friction coefficient for accurate water level prediction.
An automatic procedure to identify the bed friction coefficient is tested on a 2D hydrodynamic model of the Gironde estuary (France). The proposed procedure involves an optimization algorithm based on evolution strategy, namely Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy. Without optimization, application of the same friction distribution to different hydrological conditions leads to significant relative error in water level prediction up to 20%-30%. For the tested configuration, 300 runs seemed to be sufficient to reach an optimal value whereas an additional 200 runs would help to gain an accuracy of a few millimeters (or 0.3%). In order to reach the same level of accuracy for the different hydrological configurations, it is necessary to adapt for each configuration of the bed friction coefficient. Such behavior tends to confirm a seasonal variation of the friction coefficient and this is particularly the case in the central part of the estuary. Different relationships of the friction coefficient according to the flowrate have been incorporated inside the 2D hydrodynamic model. These relationships effectively maintain an accurate prediction of the water levels close to 10% for a wide range of hydrological configurations. (C) 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据