4.6 Article

Innate Antiviral Cytokine Response to Swine Influenza Virus by Swine Respiratory Epithelial Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 95, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00692-21

关键词

interferon-stimulated gene; interferons; swine influenza virus; swine nasal cells; swine tracheal cells

类别

资金

  1. NIAID CEIRS [HHSN2662007000006C, HHSN272201400006C, HHSN272204000004C]
  2. Georgia Research Alliance
  3. ALSAC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the innate antiviral response to swine influenza virus in primary and immortalized swine nasal and tracheal epithelial cells, showing strain- and host cell type-dependent differential expression of key interferons and interferon-stimulated genes.
Swine influenza virus (SIV) can cause respiratory illness in swine. Swine contribute to influenza virus reassortment, as avian, human, and/or swine influenza viruses can infect swine and reassort, and new viruses can emerge. Thus, it is important to determine the host antiviral responses that affect SIV replication. In this study, we examined the innate antiviral cytokine response to SIV by swine respiratory epithelial cells, focusing on the expression of interferon (IFN) and interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs). Both primary and transformed swine nasal and tracheal respiratory epithelial cells were examined following infection with field isolates. The results show that IFN and ISG expression is maximal at 12 h postinfection (hpi) and is dependent on cell type and virus genotype. IMPORTANCE Swine are considered intermediate hosts that have facilitated influenza virus reassortment events that have given rise pandemics or genetically related viruses have become established in swine. In this study, we examine the innate antiviral response to swine influenza virus in primary and immortalized swine nasal and tracheal epithelial cells, and show virus strain-and host cell type-dependent differential expression of key interferons and interferon-stimulated genes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据