4.6 Article

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Stabilized in the Closed State Induces Potent Neutralizing Responses

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 95, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00203-21

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; glycoproteins; immunization; neutralizing antibodies

类别

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [ERC-CoG648432 MEMBRANEFUSION]
  2. Medical Research Council as part of United Kingdom Research and Innovation [MC_U105181010, MC_UP_1201/16]
  3. Bavarian StMWK
  4. UKRI DIOS-Coronavirus vaccine grant [72845]
  5. Humoral Immune Correlates for COVID-19 (HICC, UKRI/NIHR), University of Cambridge [COV0170]
  6. Innovate UK [72845] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [COV0170] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that immunization with a closed state S protein trimer in mice can induce strong neutralizing antibody responses, despite the receptor binding site being occluded. Closed spikes have different protein binding properties and induce more potent neutralizing responses than expected, recruiting distinct immune responses that include neutralizing antibodies against conformational epitopes present in the closed state. The findings suggest that closed spikes, along with their improved stability and storage properties, may be a valuable component of refined, next-generation vaccines.
The majority of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in use or advanced development are based on the viral spike protein (S) as their immunogen. S is present on virions as prefusion trimers in which the receptor binding domain (RBD) is stochastically open or closed. Neutralizing antibodies have been described against both open and closed conformations. The long-term success of vaccination strategies depends upon inducing antibodies that provide long-lasting broad immunity against evolving SARS-CoV-2 strains. Here, we have assessed the results of immunization in a mouse model using an S protein trimer stabilized in the closed state to prevent full exposure of the receptor binding site and therefore interaction with the receptor. We compared this with other modified S protein constructs, including representatives used in current vaccines. We found that all trimeric S proteins induced a T cell response and long-lived, strongly neutralizing antibody responses against 2019 SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern P.1 and B.1.351. Notably, the protein binding properties of sera induced by the closed spike differed from those induced by standard S protein constructs. Closed S proteins induced more potent neutralizing responses than expected based on the degree to which they inhibit interactions between the RBD and ACE2. These observations suggest that closed spikes recruit different, but equally potent, immune responses than open spikes and that this is likely to include neutralizing antibodies against conformational epitopes present in the closed conformation. We suggest that closed spikes, together with their improved stability and storage properties, may be a valuable component of refined, next-generation vaccines. IMPORTANCE Vaccines in use against SARS-CoV-2 induce immune responses against the spike protein. There is intense interest in whether the antibody response induced by vaccines will be robust against new variants, as well as in next -generation vaccines for use in previously infected or immunized individuals. We assessed the use as an immunogen of a spike protein engineered to be conformationally stabilized in the closed state where the receptor binding site is occluded. Despite occlusion of the receptor binding site, the spike induces potently neutralizing sera against multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants. Antibodies are raised against a different pattern of epitopes to those induced by other spike constructs, preferring conformational epitopes present in the closed conformation. Closed spikes, or mRNA vaccines based on their sequence, can be a valuable component of next-generation vaccines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据