4.5 Article

Influences of Lateral Double-Layered Deflectors on Cooling Performance of Air-Cooled Condenser

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE
卷 30, 期 6, 页码 2164-2177

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11630-021-1443-2

关键词

air-cooled condenser; lateral double-layered deflectors; cooling capacity; turbine back pressure; wind speed and direction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51476055, 51821004]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB251503]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018QN036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the effects of three types of lateral double-layered deflectors on the cooling performance of ACC systems through CFD simulation methods. It was found that inclined-vertical deflectors outperform others in all cases, especially in high wind speeds, and can reduce turbine back pressure by 12.15% at 12 m/s wind speed, making them suitable for practical engineering applications under windy conditions.
The cooling performance of air-cooled condenser (ACC) is susceptible to adverse impacts of ambient winds. In this work, three kinds of lateral double-layered deflectors installed under the ACC platform are proposed to weaken the unfavorable effects of cross winds. Through CFD simulation methods, the main parameters of thermo-flow performances of a 2x660 MW direct dry cooling system are obtained, by which it can be concluded that the deflectors can effectively reduce the inlet air temperatures while enhance the mass flow rates of upwind fans due to the guiding effect, especially at high wind speeds, while the improvement of cooling capacity of ACCs in the 0 degrees wind direction is weak. The inclined-vertical deflectors are superior to others in performance improvement of ACCs for all cases, which can reduce the turbine back pressure by 12.15% when the wind speed is 12 m/s, so they can be applied to the performance enhancement of ACCs under windy conditions in practical engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据