4.7 Article

A deep investigation into the thermal degradation of urethane dimethacrylate polymer

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 147, 期 4, 页码 3083-3097

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-021-10610-y

关键词

Depolymerization; DFT; Thermal studies; Polymer lifetime; Spectroscopic analyses

资金

  1. CAPES [024/2012]
  2. POSMAT/UNESP, Sao Paulo State Foundation-FAPESP [2017/08820-8, 2018/03460-6, 2015/00615-0, 2016/01599-1, 2018/14506-7]
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [302769/2018-8, 301857/2018-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study delves into the thermal degradation process of a urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) polymer, revealing its structure, reactivity, and degradation mechanisms. The research found that the degradation time of UDMA polymer is 3 years at 100.0 degrees C, and techniques such as MIR and nuclear magnetic resonance helped to identify UDMA degradation by-products.
This work investigates in depth the thermal degradation process of a polymer of urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA). UDMA monomer has been widely used in dental restorations and biomaterials. The use of density functional theory (DFT) calculations provided the bases for understanding the structure and reactivity of the UDMA monomer. Simultaneous thermogravimetry-differential thermal analysis, Photovisual Differential Scanning Calorimetry, and mid-infrared spectroscopy (MIR) were used to examine the depolymerization and degradation process. Non-isothermal kinetics made it possible to determine the best fit (n-dimensional nucleation according to Avrami-Erofeev followed by two competitive processes: nth order with autocatalysis by-product and reaction of nth order). Furthermore, the UDMA-P lifetime (5%) was calculated to show a degradation time of 3 years at 100.0 degrees C. Notwithstanding, techniques such as MIR and nuclear magnetic resonance C-13, H-1 linked to DFT calculations helped to elucidate the cleavage positions and possible degradation by-products of UDMA degradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据