4.7 Article

Effect of combined natural convection and non-gray gas radiation on entropy generation through a cylindrical annulus

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 147, 期 6, 页码 4209-4226

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-021-10669-7

关键词

Natural convection; Gas radiation; Entropy generation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the interaction between natural convection and thermal radiation in a cylindrical annulus, revealing that radiation significantly affects fluid flow structure and temperature distribution, enhancing heat exchanges. Volumetric entropy generation due to radiative processes of medium should not be neglected, comparable to entropy generation due to heat conduction. Increasing emissivities of cylinders intensifies entropy generation due to radiation through walls, but does not impact volumetric entropy generation.
The present work is focused on the interaction between natural convection and thermal radiation in a participating medium through a cylindrical annulus. The Ray Tracing method through the quadrature T-10 has been adopted in association with the Statistical Narrow Band correlated-k (SNBCK) model to solve the radiative part of the problem. Special attention is given to entropy generation and its dependency on the various governing parameters including the inner cylinder temperature, the outer cylinder radius, emissivities of the annulus walls, and the gas pressure. The results show that radiation remarkably affects the structure of the fluid flow and the temperature distribution, enhancing heat exchanges in the annulus. Moreover, it is found that the volumetric entropy generation due to radiative processes of medium should not be neglected and is comparable to the volumetric entropy generation due to heat conduction. It is also shown that increasing the emissivities of the cylinders intensifies entropy generation due to radiation through walls, but on the other hand doesn't affect the volumetric entropy generation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据