4.7 Article

Hydrodynamic analysis of the nanofluids flow in a microchannel with hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2021.04.002

关键词

Microchannel heat sinks; Super-hydrophobic surfaces; Nanofluid; pressure drop; Pumping Power; Hydrodynamic analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the hydrodynamic features of nanofluids flowing in straight microchannels with walls of varying hydrophobicities using the finite volume method. The results indicated that nanofluids increase pumping power, with superhydrophobic walls and nanofluids significantly reducing pressure drop.
We studied the hydrodynamic features of the nanofluids flowing inside a straight microchannel with hydrophilic, hydrophobic, and superhydrophobic walls by the finite volume method. The single-phase method is applied for the prediction of hydrodynamic properties of water/Al2O3 nanofluids. The nanofluid is based on deionized water with particle concentrations of 0.1%, 0.5%, and 1.0%. Interpretations for velocity profiles, Poiseuille number, pumping power, and friction coefficients are presented for different hydrophobicities of the walls. We considered various flows with Reynolds numbers in the range of 50 to 400 and constant heat flux of 10,000 W/m2. The obtained results depict that the implementation of nanofluids leads to increase pumping power which is greater for higher volume fractions. The Poiseuille number shows that the effects of the entry region decrease when the superhydrophobic walls are applied because of the reduction in velocity slopes at the wall. For hydrophilic walls, nanofluid increases the pumping power by 74%. However, superhydrophobic walls with the nanofluid flow cause a 47% decrease in pumping power compared to the water flow with the usual walls. Using the superhydrophobic wall with nanofluids resolves the disadvantages of pressure drop rises significantly. (c) 2021 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据