4.6 Article

Bond strength of demineralized dentin after synthesized collagen/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite application

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104590

关键词

Carious affected dentin; Collage; Cross-linkers; Hydroxyapatite; Remineralization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By self-assembling hydroxyapatite on collagen fibers in different ratios, we can improve the micro-tensile bond strength and potentially enhance adhesion to the carious zone and its durability.
Treatment the deeper and remineralizable carious zone (DRCZ) in dentin with various remineralizing methods, either with classic top-down or biomimetic bottom-up remineralization approaches, has remained a constant main issue to enhance dentin substrate bonding quality. The concern of remineralizing the remaining, partially demineralized and physiologically re-mineralizable collagen fibrils was the optimum target. However, applying already mineralized type I collage fibrils which have the ability to chemically cross-link with remaining collagen and minerals did not gain much interest. Synthesis of collagen/hydroxyapatite (Col/Hap) nanocomposite was done with self-assembling Hap in situ onto Col fibrils with different % (70/30, 50/50, 30/70% of Col/Hap, respectively). Micro-tensile bond strength (mu TBS) was evaluated after pre-treatment of artificially demineralized dentin with these suggested protocols [nanocomposite together with grape seed extract (GSE; 6.5%) cross-linker for two periods, 10min and 1 h] then applying self-adhesive bonding system. Applied Col/Hap (30/70%) together with GSE (6.5%) gave the significantly highest mu TBS (25.04 +/- 5.47 and 25.53 +/- 7.64 MPa, for 10min and 1 h application times, respectively). After thermocycling for 10,000 cycles at 5 and 55 degrees C, mu TBS for all protocols and both application times substantially decreased especially for the two control groups. Using the suggested dentin pre-treatment protocols, in chair-side, may possibly enhance the bond strength to DRCZ and its durability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据