4.7 Article

Bulk high-entropy hexaborides

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 41, 期 12, 页码 5775-5781

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.05.027

关键词

High-entropy ceramics; Hexaboride; Reactive SPS; Hardness; Work function

资金

  1. UC Irvine MRSEC, Center for Complex and Active Materials, under National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR2011967]
  2. ONR MURI program [N000141512863]
  3. National Science Foundation Major Research Instrumentation Program [CHE1338173]
  4. NSF [DMR2011967]
  5. UC Irvine Materials Research Institute (IMRI)
  6. U.S. DOE Office of Science Facility [DESC0012704]
  7. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [N000141512863] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A group of CaB6-typed cubic rare earth high-entropy hexaborides have been successfully fabricated into dense bulk pellets with high microhardness and Young's moduli. The material's work functions were significantly higher than LaB6, as determined by ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy.
For the first time, a group of CaB6-typed cubic rare earth high-entropy hexaborides have been successfully fabricated into dense bulk pellets (>98.5 % in relative densities). The specimens are prepared from elemental precursors via in-situ metal-boron reactive spark plasma sintering. The sintered bulk pellets are determined to be single-phase without any detectable oxides or other secondary phases. The homogenous elemental distributions have been confirmed at both microscale and nanoscale. The Vickers microhardness are measured to be 16-18 GPa at a standard indentation load of 9.8 N. The nanoindentation hardness and Young's moduli have been measured to be 19-22 GPa and 190-250 GPa, respectively, by nanoindentation test using a maximum load of 500 mN. The material work functions are determined to be 3.7-4.0 eV by ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy characterizations, which are significantly higher than that of LaB6.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据