4.7 Article

Ultra-high-temperature mechanical behaviors of two-dimensional carbon fiber reinforced silicon carbide composites: Experiment and modeling

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 2335-2346

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.11.057

关键词

C/SiC composites; Mechanical behaviors; Ultra-high temperature

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing [cstc2019jcyj-msxmX0038]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11802019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a method for testing the mechanical properties of materials at ultra-high temperatures in an inert atmosphere, focusing on the flexural properties of 2D plain-weave C/SiC up to 2600 degrees Celsius. The experimental results provide significant insights into the mechanical behaviors of C/SiC under ultra-high-temperature extreme environment conditions.
Carbon fiber reinforced silicon carbide (C/SiC) composites are enabling materials for components working in ultra-high-temperature extreme environments. However, their mechanical properties reported in the literature are mainly limited to room and moderate temperatures. In this work, an ultra-high-temperature testing method for the mechanical properties of materials in inert atmosphere is presented based on the induction heating technology. The flexural properties of a 2D plain-weave C/SiC are studied up to 2600 degrees C in inert atmosphere for the first time. The deformation characteristics and failure mechanisms at elevated temperatures are gained. Theoretical models for the high-temperature Young's modulus and tensile strength of 2D ceramic matrix composites are then developed based on the mechanical mechanisms revealed in the experiments. The factors contributing to the mechanical behaviors of C/SiC at elevated temperatures are thus characterized quantitatively. The results provide significant understanding of the mechanical behaviors of C/SiC under ultra-high-temperature extreme environment conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据