4.7 Article

Correlation between crystal structure and dielectric characteristics of Ti4+ substituted CaSnSiO5 ceramics

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 2568-2578

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.12.010

关键词

CaSnSiO5 ceramic; Crystal structure; Phase transition; Dielectric properties

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC-52072133, 51772107, 61771215]
  2. Research Projects of Electronic Components and Devices of China [1807WM0004]
  3. Major Programs of Technical Innovation in Hubei Province of China [2018AAA039]
  4. Innovation Team Program of Hubei Province, China [2019CFA004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The crystal structure and dielectric properties of Ti4+-substituted CaSnSiO5 ceramic were investigated, where Ti4+ entirely substituted Sn4+ leading to structural evolution and change in dielectric properties. The results provided ways to control the tau(f) value of microwave dielectric ceramics.
The crystal structure and dielectric properties of Ti4+-substituted CaSnSiO5 ceramic were investigated. Ti4+ entirely substituted Sn4+ of CaSnSiO5, and the solid solutions were formed at Ca(Sn1-xTix)SiO5 (0 < x < 1.0) ceramics. The evolutions of crystal structure were analysed through Rietveld refinement and transmission electron microscopy, and the phase transition from A2/a to P2(1)/a space groups at Ca(Sn1-xTix)SiO5 (0.9 <= x <= 1.0) ceramics was clarified. The change in dielectric properties was related to the structural evolution of Ca (Sn1-xTix)SiO5 (0 <= x <= 1.0). The of values of Ca(Sn1-xTix)SiO5 (0 <= x <= 0.4) ceramics initially decreased to +49.8 ppm/degrees C and then increased to +98.3 ppm/degrees C because of Sn/TiO6 octahedral distortion. The temperature coefficient of capacitance and epsilon(r) anomaly peak were controlled by Ti4+ substitution for Sn4+ at Ca(Sn1-xTix)SiO5 (0.4 <= x <= 1.0) ceramics. The results provided a way to control the of the tau(f) value of microwave dielectric ceramics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据