4.7 Article

Advance Care Planning in Older Adults with CKD: Patient, Care Partner, and Clinician Perspectives

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
卷 32, 期 6, 页码 1527-1535

出版社

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2020091298

关键词

-

资金

  1. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Award [CDR-2017C1-6297]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Older patients with advanced CKD are at high risk for complications and death, yet discussions on advance care planning (ACP) with kidney clinicians are rare. Study found discordant views between patients and clinicians on ACP, with cultural and religious barriers. Four themes influencing ACP discussions emerged, leading to insufficient ACP discussions with older adults with advanced CKD.
Background Older patients with advanced CKD are at high risk for serious complications and death, yet few discuss advance care planning (ACP) with their kidney clinicians. Examining barriers and facilitators to ACP among such patients might help identify patient-centered opportunities for improvement. Methods In semistructured interviews in March through August 2019 with purposively sampled patients (aged >70 years, CKD stages 4-5, nondialysis), care partners, and clinicians at clinics in across the United States, participants described discussions, factors contributing to ACP completion or avoidance, and perceived value of ACP. We used thematic analysis to analyze data. Results We conducted 68 semistructured interviews with 23 patients, 19 care partners, and 26 clinicians. Only seven of 26 (27%) clinicians routinely discussed ACP. About half of the patients had documented ACP, mostly outside the health care system. We found divergent ACP definitions and perspectives; kidney clinicians largely defined ACP as completion of formal documentation, whereas patients viewed it more holistically, wanting discussions about goals, prognosis, and disease trajectory. Clinicians avoided ACP with patients from minority groups, perceiving cultural or religious barriers. Four themes and subthemes informing variation in decisions to discuss ACP and approaches emerged: (1) role ambiguity and responsibility for ACP, (2) questioning the value of ACP, (3) confronting institutional barriers (time, training, reimbursement, and the electronic medical record, EMR), and (4) consequences of avoiding ACP (disparities in ACP access and overconfidence that patients' wishes are known). Conclusions Patients, care partners, and clinicians hold discordant views about the responsibility for discussing ACP and the scope for it. This presents critical barriers to the process, leaving ACP insufficiently discussed with older adults with advanced CKD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据