4.8 Article

A Bioinspired Molybdenum Catalyst for Aqueous Perchlorate Reduction

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 143, 期 21, 页码 7891-7896

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c00595

关键词

-

资金

  1. UC Riverside startup grant
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems, Environmental Engineering Program [CBET-1932942]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (DOE-EPSCoR) [DE-SC0016272]
  4. NSF Division of Chemistry, Chemical Catalysis Program [CHE-1566106]
  5. U.S. DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  6. NSF Major Research Instrumentation Program [CHE-1338173]
  7. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0016272] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a hybrid catalyst for reducing aqueous ClO4- into Cl- at room temperature with 1 atm of H-2, showing high turnover number and turnover frequency.
Perchlorate (ClO4-) is a pervasive, harmful, and inert anion on both Earth and Mars. Current technologies for ClO4- reduction entail either harsh conditions or multicomponent enzymatic processes. Herein, we report a heterogeneous (L)Mo-Pd/C catalyst directly prepared from Na2MoO4, a bidentate nitrogen ligand (L), and Pd/C to reduce aqueous ClO4- into Cl- with 1 atm of H-2 at room temperature. A suite of instrument characterizations and probing reactions suggest that the Mo-VI precursor and L at the optimal 1:1 ratio are transformed in situ into oligomeric Mo-IV active sites at the carbon-water interface. For each Mo site, the initial turnover frequency (TOF0) for oxygen atom transfer from ClOx- substrates reached 165 h(-1). The turnover number (TON) reached 3840 after a single batch reduction of 100 mM ClO4-. This study provides a water-compatible, efficient, and robust catalyst to degrade and utilize ClO4- for water purification and space exploration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据