4.6 Article

Wireless edge caching based on content similarity in dynamic environments

期刊

JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE
卷 115, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysarc.2021.102000

关键词

Mobile edge computing; Dynamic caching; Cache algorithm; Wireless network

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Edge caching is a promising technology for data-intensive and latency-sensitive applications on the eve of large-scale commercial operation of 5G. The Similarity-Aware Popularity-based Caching (SAPoC) algorithm utilizes content similarity to improve the performance of wireless edge caching in dynamic scenarios, outperforming typical proposals in cache hit ratio and energy consumption.
Edge caching could greatly relieve the burden of the backbone network and reduce the content request latency experienced by end-user devices. This makes edge caching a promising technology for enabling data-intensive and latency-sensitive applications on the eve of the large-scale commercial operation of 5G. However, the slow-start phenomenon incurred by existing request history-based caching strategies limits the performance of wireless edge caching, especially in the dynamic scenario where both mobile devices and contents arrive and leave periodically. On the other hand, it is also a hard task for deep reinforcement learning-based methods to adapt to the dynamics of the environment. In this backdrop, a new caching algorithm, called Similarity-Aware Popularity-based Caching (SAPoC), is presented in this paper to promote the performance of wireless edge caching in dynamic scenarios through utilizing the similarity among contents. In SAPoC algorithm, a content?s popularity is determined by not only its requests history but also its similarity with existing popular ones to enable a quick-start of newly arrived contents. A series of simulation experiments are conducted to evaluate SAPoC algorithm?s performance. Results have shown that SAPoC outperforms several typical proposals in both cache hit ratio and energy consumption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据