4.5 Article

Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD4+ T-cell response is increased, and Treg cells decreased, in anthelmintic-treated patients with latent TB

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 752-761

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201545843

关键词

Anthelmintic treatment; Helminth infection; IFN-gamma; Latent TB infection; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Regulatory T (Treg) cells

资金

  1. European Union [241642]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In many settings, adults with active or latent tuberculosis will also be coinfected with helminths. Our study aimed to investigate how anthelmintic treatment modulates antimycobacterial immunity, in a setting where helminth reinfection should not occur. We investigated the potential impact of helminth infection on immune responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) in patients with latent Mtb infection with or without helminth infection (Strongyloides or Schistosoma), and tested T-cell responses before and after anthelmintic treatment. The study was performed in migrants resident in the United Kingdom, where reexposure and reinfection following anthelmintic treatment would not occur. The frequency of CD4(+)IFN-gamma(+) T cells was measured following stimulation with Mtb Purified Protein Derivative or ESAT-6/CFP-10 antigen, and concentrations of IFN-gamma in culture supernatants measured by ELISA and multiplex bead array. Helminth infection was associated with a lower frequency of CD4(+)IFN-gamma(+) T cells, which increased following treatment. Patients with helminth infection showed a significant increase in CD4(+)FoxP3(+) T cells (Treg) compared to those without helminth infection. There was a decrease in the frequency of Treg cells, and an associated increase in CD4(+)IFN-gamma(+) T cells after the anthelmintic treatment. Here, we show a potential role of Treg cells in reducing the frequency and function of antimycobacterial CD4(+)IFN-gamma(+) T cells, and that these effects are reversed after anthelmintic treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据