4.8 Article

[2.2]Paracyclophane-based hole-transporting materials for perovskite solar cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 491, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229543

关键词

Hole transporting materials (HTMs); Perovskite solar cells (PSCs); [2,2]paracyclophane

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST 108-2113-M-029-011, 109-2112-M-027-003-MY2]
  2. National Taipei University of Technology
  3. Tunghai university

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that using novel WS-HTMs instead of spiro-OMeTAD can enhance the performance of perovskite solar cells, with devices based on WS-1 and WS-2 HTMs showing better power conversion efficiency and stability. By improving hole mobility and charge transfer efficiency, WS-HTMs achieved good results.
To develope an alternative efficient hole-transporting materials (HTMs) to 2,2',7,7',-tertrakis(N,N-p-dimethox-yphenylamino)-9,9'-spirobifuorene (spiro-OMeTAD) for high performance perovskite solar cells (PSCs), we demonstrate a series of donor-pi-donor HTMs (WS-1, WS-2, and WS-4 HTMs) with [2.2]paracyclophane ([2.2] PCP) as the core structure and triphenylamine as four arms at pseudo-para and pseudo-ortho orientations. Compared with the well-known HTM of spiro-OMeTAD, WS-HTMs has a simpler synthetic route and short synthesis steps (3-4 steps). Due to the improved hole mobility and good charge transfer efficiency of pseudo-para- [2.2]PCP HTMs (WS-1 and WS-2), the out-of-plane carrier transport is enhanced and the PSC base on WS-1/WS-2 HTMs achieve higher J(sc) and ff values than the device based on pseudo-ortho-[2.2]PCP HTM (WS-4). A SnO2 electron transport layer (ETL) with WS-1 HTM shows the best power conversion efficiency of 19.13% in a PSC, which is higher than that of spiro-OMeTAD (17.71%) under the same conditions. The WS-HTMs also provided better stability and moisture resistance in PSCs, which prolongs the lifetime in the ambient environment than in case of spiro-OMeTAD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据