4.5 Article

A rosette like carbon structure controlled through ammoniation for superior adsorption of cationic brilliant green dye

期刊

JOURNAL OF POROUS MATERIALS
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 1129-1136

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10934-021-01067-3

关键词

Ammonia explosion; Surface structure; Porous; Brilliant green; Adsorbing performance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51802322]
  2. S&T Innovation 2025 Major Special Programme of Ningbo [2018B10054]
  3. K. C. Wong Education Foundation [GJTD-2019-13]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Project [ZDRW-CN-2019-3]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2020JQ-857]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the influence of three carbon materials obtained from the explosion of acetylene gas on the adsorption performance of brilliant green dye. The Rosette like carbon (RLC) shows excellent adsorption properties and high reusability, making it an ideal substitute for existing carbon adsorbents.
This paper investigates the influence of the structure, composition, pore size distribution and morphology of three carbon materials obtained from the explosion of acetylene gas on the adsorption performance of brilliant green (BG) dye. During the process, Rosette like carbon (RLC) is obtained in the detonation reaction gas with small amount of ammonia. It shows excellent adsorption properties and high reusability. The adsorption capacity is more than twice of C-nN and C-pN at the concentration of BG of 100 mg/L, the maximum monolayer adsorption capacity of 357.32 mg/g, elimination efficiency can reach 88.5% after 10 cycles of adsorbing BG, which is the best adsorption performance among the currently reported carbon materials. The adsorption equilibrium accords with Langmuir isotherm model and falls into single molecular layer absorption. The temperature and pH value selected have little effect on its adsorption capacity. The excellent properties of RLC contribute to an ideal substitute to the existing adsorbents of carbon materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据