4.5 Article

Decomposition mechanism on different surfaces of copper azide

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER
卷 33, 期 25, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/abf978

关键词

copper azide; energetic materials; first-principals calculations; surface energy; decomposition mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51971037]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0701603]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the (010)(N3), (100)(N3), and (001) facets are the most stable surfaces of copper azide crystal, and the decomposition process takes place on the surfaces, releasing high energy and with a low energy barrier.
Copper azide, a potential primary explosives that may replace traditional primers such as lead azide, mercury fulminate and silver azide, has received widespread attention, but its decomposition mechanism remains unclear. Here, based on first-principles calculations, (010)(N3), (100)(N3) and (001) facets with a copper/nitrogen atom ratio of 1/6 are found to be the most stable surfaces of copper azide crystal. Through transition state (TS) calculations, we find that during the decomposition process on the surface, there is a synergy effect between two Cu-N1-N2-N3 chains, where the terminal N2-N3 bonds on two chains break simultaneously, and the dissociated N3 atom bonds with another N3 ' atom of adjacent chain to form a N-2 molecule. Next, the Cu-N bond will rupture, and two more N-2 molecules (N1-N2, N1 '-N2 ') desorb from the surface. The overall reaction releases above 4 eV energy at a barrier of 1.23 eV on (001) surface. Electronic structure calculations reveal that the TS of N2-N3 rupture is more stabilized than that of N1-N2. According to the above results, we propose a new decomposition mechanism based on simulations of N-N bond breaking on different surfaces of copper azide. The results underscore the surface effect in decomposition of energetic materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据