4.5 Article

FOXP1 is a regulator of quiescence in healthy human CD4+ T cells and is constitutively repressed in T cells from patients with lymphoproliferative disorders

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 47, 期 1, 页码 168-179

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201646373

关键词

CD4(+) T cells; FOXP1; lymphocytic variant hypereosinophilic syndrome; quiescence

资金

  1. Belgian Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS)
  2. FNRS-Operation Televie
  3. Les Amis de l'Institut Bordet
  4. Medic Foundation
  5. Plan Cancer of Belgium
  6. Fonds J.C. Heuson
  7. Fonds Lambeau-Marteaux

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The forkhead box P1 (FOXP1) transcription factor has been shown to regulate the generation and maintenance of quiescent naive murine T cells. In humans, FOXP1 expression has been correlated with overall survival in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), although its regulatory role in T-cell function is currently unknown. We found that FOXP1 is normally expressed in all human leukocyte subpopulations. Focusing on primary human CD4(+) T cells, we show that nuclear expression of FOXP1 predominates in naive cells with significant downregulation detected in memory cells from blood and tonsils. FOXP1 is repressed following in vitro T-cell activation of naive T cells, and later re-established in memory CD4(+) T cells, albeit at lower levels. DNA methylation analysis revealed that epigenetic mechanisms participate in regulating the human FOXP1 gene. ShRNA-mediated FOXP1 repression induces CD4(+) T cells to enter the cell cycle, acquire memory-like markers and upregulate helper T-cell differentiation genes. In patients with lymphoproliferative disorders, FOXP1 expression is constitutionally repressed in the clonal T cells in parallel with overexpression of helper T-cell differentiation genes. Collectively, these data identify FOXP1 as an essential transcriptional regulator for primary human CD4(+) T cells and suggest its potential important role in the development of PTCL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据