4.8 Article

Oxidative Strong Metal-Support Interactions between Metals and Inert Boron Nitride

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 12, 期 17, 页码 4187-4194

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00934

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21825203, 21688102, 91945302]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFA0200200, 2017YFB0602205]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB17020000]
  4. Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy (DNL) Cooperation Fund [DNL201907]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reports the oxidative strong metalsupport interaction (O-SMSI) effect between Pt nanoparticles and inert hexagonal boron nitride sheets, where the oxidized boron overlayer derived from the boron nitride support enhances CO oxidation reaction by working synergistically with surface Pt sites. This effect is also observed in other h-BN-supported metal catalysts and is determined by metal-boron interaction and the oxygen affinity of metals in different oxidative atmospheres.
The strong metal-support interaction (SMSI) is one of the most important concepts in heterogeneous catalysis, which has been widely investigated between metals and active oxides triggered by reductive atmospheres. Here, we report the oxidative strong metalsupport interaction (O-SMSI) effect between Pt nanoparticles (NPs) and inert hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) sheets, in which Pt NPs are encapsulated by oxidized boron (BOx) overlayers derived from the h-BN support under oxidative conditions. De-encapsulation of Pt NPs has been achieved by washing in water, and the residual ultrathin BOx overlayers work synergistically with surface Pt sites for enhancing CO oxidation reaction. The O-SMSI effect is also present in other h-BN-supported metal catalysts such as Au, Rh, Ru, and Ir within different oxidative atmospheres including O-2 and CO2, which is determined by metal-boron interaction and O affinity of metals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据