4.8 Article

Imaging Plasmons with Sub-2 nm Spatial Resolution via Tip-Enhanced Four-Wave Mixing

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 12, 期 14, 页码 3535-3539

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00763

关键词

-

资金

  1. United States Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences Biosciences
  2. United States Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, through the bioimaging technology development program
  3. Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research demonstrates that four-wave mixing at plasmonic tip-sample nano-junctions can visualize plasmonic fields with sub-2 nm spatial resolution under ambient laboratory conditions. By utilizing specific techniques, the four-wave mixing signal can be further enhanced, paving the way for visualizing chemical transformations and coherent electronic and vibrational dynamics with femtosecond temporal and few-nanometer spatial resolution under ambient conditions.
Four-wave mixing at plasmonic tip-sample nano-junctions may be used to visualize plasmonic fields with sub-2 nm spatial resolution under ambient laboratory conditions. We illustrate the latter using a gold-coated atomic force microscopy probe irradiated with a pair of near-infrared femtosecond laser pulses and used to image plasmonic gold nanoplates and silver nanocubes. Through diagnostic polarization-dependent tip-only measurements, we illustrate that the four-wave mixing signal is localized to the tip apex. The apex-bound signal is further enhanced when the tip is located at specific locations near plasmonic nanoparticles. Overall, this work paves the way for visualizing chemical transformations as well as coherent electronic and vibrational dynamics with joint femtosecond temporal and few-nanometer spatial resolution under ambient conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据