4.8 Article

Excited State Structure Correlates with Efficient Photoconversion in Unidirectional Motors

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 12, 期 13, 页码 3367-3372

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00710

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Ministry of Education, Culture and Science [024.001.035]
  2. EPSRC [EP/R042357/1, EP/J009148/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/J009148/1, EP/R042357/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that electron withdrawing substituents lead to higher activity in lower frequency modes in molecular motors, causing a distortion in the ethylenic axle. Conversely, electron donating substituents maintain the double bond character of the axle. Additionally, further structural reorganization is observed on a sub-picosecond time scale.
The design of unidirectional photomolecular motors demands a critical understanding of an ultrafast photochemical isomerization. An intermediate dark excited state mediates the reaction via a conical intersection (CI) with the ground state, but a correlation between molecular structure and photoisomerization efficiency has remained elusive. Here femtosecond stimulated Raman spectroscopy captures vibrational spectra of the dark state in a set of molecular motors bearing different substituents. A direct correlation between isomerization quantum yield, dark state lifetime, and excited state vibrational spectrum is found. Electron withdrawing substituents lead to activity in lower frequency modes, which we correlate with a pyramidalization distortion at the ethylenic axle occurring within 100 fs. This structure is not formed with an electron donating substituent, where the axle retains double bond character. Further structural reorganization is observed and assigned to excited state reorganization and charge redistribution on the sub-picosecond time scale. The correlation of the dark state structure with photoconversion performance suggests guidelines for developing new more efficient motor derivatives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据