4.8 Article

Coexistence of Parallel and Rotary Stackings in the Lamellar Crystals of a Perylene Bisimide Dyad for Temperature-Sensitive Bicomponent Emission

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 12, 期 13, 页码 3373-3378

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00674

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21975076, 21733005, 52003089, 51873068, 51521002]
  2. Key Laboratory of Luminescence from Molecular Aggregates of Guangdong Province [2019B030301003]
  3. Key Program of Guangzhou Scientific Research Special Project [201904020035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The coexistence of rotationally pi-pi stacked columns and discrete slip-stacked dimers of PBI chromophores was revealed in the lamellar crystal of a head-to-tail linked PBI dyad. The lamellar crystals exhibited a low photoluminescence efficiency at room temperature, but showed a dramatic increase to around 90% at low temperature. Both the rotary and slip-stacked moieties were emissive, with nonradiative energy transfer processes between them being suppressed at low temperature, ensuring highly efficient excimer-like long-lived fluorescence.
Coexistence of rotationally pi-pi stacked columns and discrete slip-stacked dimers of perylene bisimide (PBI) chromophores is revealed by single crystal X-ray diffraction in the lamellar crystal of a head-to-tail linked PBI dyad. The rotary pi-pi stacked columnar moieties show H-type spectral character with relatively higher excitation energy, while the discrete slip-stacked pi-pi dimers have J-type spectral behavior with lower excitation energy. The lamellar crystals show relatively low photoluminescence efficiency of 12% at room temperature, while this dramatically increases to similar to 90% at low temperature (80 K). Both of the rotary and slip-stacked moieties are emissive, and the nonradiative energy transfer processes between them are suppressed at low temperature, ensuring the highly efficient excimer-like long-lived fluorescence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据