4.8 Article

Ultra-Narrow-Band NIR Photomultiplication Organic Photodetectors Based on Charge Injection Narrowing

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 2937-2943

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00330

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61975006, 61874016, 62075155]
  2. Postdoctoral Innovative Talent Support Program [BX20200042]
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [4192049]
  4. Region Grand Est [ANR-17-CE05-0012]
  5. French National Research Agency (ANR) [ANR-17-CE05-0012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultra-narrow-band NIR organic photodetectors with photomultiplication capabilities were developed by narrowing charge injection using interfacial traps. By incorporating BEH and F(6)TCNNQ into the active layers, high EQE values at 850 nm were achieved with improved rejection ratios.
Ultra-narrow-band NIR photomultiplication organic photodetectors (PM-OPDs) were realized in ITO/PEDOT:PSS/active layers/Al based on an interfacial-trap-induced charge injection narrowing (CIN) concept. The rather less Bod Ethex-Hex (BEH) is imbedded in a polymer donor matrix to form large amounts of isolated electron traps. Trapped electrons in BEH close to an Al electrode will enforce hole-tunneling injection induced by interfacial band bending, resulting in a photomultiplication phenomenon. PM-OPDs with P3HT:BEH as the active layer exhibit a narrow response peak at 850 nm with a full-width at half-maximum (fwhm) of 27 nm as well as a rather weak response from 650 to 800 nm. The EQE of 29 700% at 850 nm was achieved in PM-OPDs by incorporating 0.02 wt % of F(6)TCNNQ under -13 V of applied voltage. The rejection ratio (RR) of the optimized PM-OPDs with F(6)TCNNQ is 11 for EQE(850 nm)/EQE(700 nm) and 10 for EQE(850 nm)/EQE(750 nm), respectively. An EQE of 15 300% at 850 nm was achieved in the ternary PM-OPDs under -13 V of applied voltage, with markedly enhanced RRs of 44 for EQE(850 nm)/EQE(700 nm) and 30 for EQE(850 nm)/EQE(750 nm).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据