4.6 Article

Topochemical Intercalation of Graphitic Carbon Nitride with Alkali Metals in Ethylenediamine

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 125, 期 18, 页码 9947-9955

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c02688

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of South Korea [NRF-2014R1A5A1009799]
  2. [IBS-R019-D1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed the formation of ordered layer structures in new alkali-ethylenediamine-gCN products synthesized using a one-pot topochemical method. Various analyses indicated a high degree of topochemical reaction between organic entities and interlayer spacings during intercalation. Molecular dynamics studies demonstrated the predominant presence of trans conformation ethylenediamine molecules in the interlayer spaces.
We studied the intercalation chemistry of graphitic carbon nitride (gCN), combining theory and experimental methods. A series of new alkali-ethylenediamine-gCN products were prepared using a one-pot topochemical synthesis method. Spectroscopic and thermal analyses showed that single-stage intercalated gCN compounds of Li-(ethylenediamine)(0.2) (C3N4.5H1.5)(1.0) and Na(ethylenediamine)(0.3)(C3N4.5H1.5)(0.9) with ordered layer structures were formed. X-ray diffractograms indicated a large gallery expansion of 0.349 and similar to 0.342 nm for Li- and Na-intercalated gCN. In the case of K-en-gCN, a nanocomposite was formed that underwent spontaneous in situ exfoliation followed by disordered restacking to form thin flakes. Molecular dynamics studies showed that ethylenediamine molecules were distributed at the center of the interlayer spaces, predominantly adopting a trans conformation. Different types of gallery sites were present for the intercalation of guest alkali metals, leading to a high degree of topochemical intercalation with organic entities under lower temperatures than previously reported in thermal intercalation experiments. Our new synthesis route enables facile intercalation to tune interlayer spacing in gCN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据